AUKUS, the defense pact between Australia, the UK, and the US, has faced scrutiny and skepticism, particularly in Australia, despite strong support from the US. The article highlights the need for Australia to address public perception and political consensus around AUKUS, especially regarding the use of submarines in regional conflicts. The Pentagon's review of AUKUS, led by Elbridge Colby, and the re-election of Donald Trump, initially raised doubts about the deal's future. However, Trump's support and the Pentagon's commitment have solidified the pact's trajectory. The focus now shifts to Australia's political commitment, with concerns about a potential Labor government backtracking on the agreement. The article emphasizes the importance of transparent communication about the pact's purpose and strategic necessity, especially regarding the use of submarines. It suggests that Australia's reluctance to publicly acknowledge the potential use of submarines in a regional conflict against China has created doubt and weakened the deterrent effect. The Pentagon's review shared this concern, and the issue was further highlighted by the pejorative reporting of second-hand submarines. Experts like Abraham Denmark and Bryan Clark argue that the submarines are a world-class capability and that Australia needs to establish a social license for AUKUS. The article concludes by calling for more candour and transparency from Australia to address public skepticism and strengthen the political consensus around AUKUS.
